home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=93TT2236>
- <title>
- Dec. 20, 1993: Blinded By The Light
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1993
- Dec. 20, 1993 Enough! The War Over Handguns
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- SCIENCE, Page 54
- Blinded By The Light
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>Physicists take an important step toward limitless clean energy,
- but the payoff won't come for decades
- </p>
- <p>By Michael D. Lemonick
- </p>
- <p> As the clock crept toward 11:15 p.m. last Thursday, the 500
- scientists and engineers packed into the control room and an
- adjacent auditorium at the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
- kept their eyes riveted on a bank of computer monitors. They
- waited anxiously as technicians injected less than 1 oz. of
- tritium gas into the doughnut-shaped hollow at the heart of
- a 50-ft.-tall reactor in the next room. Then they waited some
- more as the tritium mixed with deuterium gas already inside
- and the combination was heated with powerful radio beams.
- </p>
- <p> The temperature climbed above 100 million degrees--three times
- hotter than the core of the sun--causing the mixture to ignite
- suddenly in a nuclear-fusion reaction, the same kind that takes
- place inside stars and hydrogen bombs. More than 3 million watts
- of energy began pouring from the superheated gas inside the
- Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor, and for the four seconds or so
- that the experiment lasted, the hottest spot in the solar system
- by a sizable margin was in Plainsboro, New Jersey.
- </p>
- <p> As the computers flashed confirmation of the power output, the
- onlookers erupted in cheers, and not a few tears. Some of them
- had worked on the project for more than 20 years, and the success
- of the experiment last week proved that the time had not been
- wasted. Not only had the researchers trounced the 1.7 million-watt
- record set by a similar European reactor early last year, they
- had also taken a major step toward exploiting a safe, clean
- source of power that uses fuels extracted from ordinary water.
- </p>
- <p> That doesn't mean, however, that anyone should rush to invest
- in fusion futures. Impressive as Tokamak's achievement was,
- the $1.6 billion machine generated only one-eighth as much power
- as it consumed. The next day the reactor managed to generate
- more than 5 million watts. But even its eventual goal of 10
- million will still be only half of the incoming energy. The
- experiment is an important milestone, but fusion power is still
- a long way from being commercially useful.
- </p>
- <p> When scientists began working on fusion half a century ago,
- they had no idea the process would be so hard. It had been relatively
- easy to get energy through nuclear fission, the breaking apart
- of such heavy atoms as uranium. That led to A-bombs and today's
- nuclear power plants. But fusion--the forcing together of
- light atomic nuclei, like those of hydrogen--can release even
- more energy. The problem is that hydrogen nuclei carry a positive
- electric charge, and thus they repel one another; they have
- to be slammed together with terrific force before they will
- stick. In an H-bomb, that force is provided by a powerful explosive--an A-bomb, in fact. Inside the sun and other stars, it is
- a combination of high temperature, which makes the nuclei bounce
- around with enormous energy, and pressure, which keeps them
- from bouncing away entirely.
- </p>
- <p> A-bomb blasts are hardly practical in power plants, and the
- sun's internal pressure is impossible to duplicate on earth.
- So fusion scientists put their nuclei in a bottle--not a physical
- one, since any contact with the walls would instantly cool the
- gas and kill the reaction--but a bottle made of magnetic fields.
- The researchers would make up for the comparatively low pressure
- inside by raising the temperature to unheard-of levels. (A competing
- idea that shows promise uses converging laser beams to compress
- and ignite a stream of tiny, gas-filled glass pellets.)
- </p>
- <p> Confining a gas made of electrically charged atomic nuclei--a plasma--has proved to be far more complex than anyone had
- suspected, and so has heating it. While the first rudimentary
- fusion reactors were a few feet across and weighed a ton or
- two, the Tokamak weighs hundreds of tons and fills a gymnasium-size
- room. A commercial reactor would be much bigger still and with
- current technology would cost hundreds of billions of dollars.
- </p>
- <p> The main attraction of fusion is the potentially limitless fuel
- supply. The ideal fuel is not plain hydrogen but the formula
- used last week: a mixture of deuterium and tritium, two isotopes
- of hydrogen that have extra neutrons in their nuclei. Even though
- they're rarer than ordinary hydrogen, scientists estimate that
- enough of these two isotopes could be extracted from the top
- 2 in. of water in Lake Erie to match the energy in all the world's
- oil reserves.
- </p>
- <p> But no one knows for sure whether fusion on a large scale will
- be practical. The U.S. Department of Energy has canceled a bigger
- machine that was supposed to go beyond what Tokamak can achieve.
- Instead America will join the Europeans, Japanese and Russians
- in building the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor;
- when it goes into operation a decade or so from now, fusion
- scientists should finally have a device that generates more
- power than it consumes. Even then it will take decades of engineering
- before any households could possibly draw electricity from a
- commercial fusion plant.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-